Sure, Wang Jun registered in China, Louis Vuitton trademark and patent behavior of product appearance is a cybersquatting act, his purpose?
Wang Jun 6 November, 2007 issue LV compromise, willing to the price of lv handbags RMB 1 transfer to the LV series of hands-owned intellectual property, provided that the LV to grant exclusivity in Wuhan agency. Direct sales model, but with the LV would be difficult to achieve.
Peace plan came to nothing, Wang Jun, the attitude of the LV had to be prepared, The reason I hand the Chinese 'Louis Vuitton' of trademark and patent rights without the production stage, because I respect the LV the top brands, but the LV side delayed position I feel no sense to wait, before Christmas if they do not have the right to agency substantive negotiations with me after Christmas, I will immediately terminate louis handbags all negotiations to enter the production process of China 'Louis Vuitton' The price is only one-third of LV products, I believe, when China's boss and his staff are in use when Louis Vuitton,
LV top brand in China's international status will not be secure.
Wang Jun also said that if the LV can not authorize the agent to buy back the franchise is not possible, 120 million yuan on the transaction. He stressed that if the delay will increase the price.
Wang Jun, the two cases presented:
1. LV invested 120 million buying back the patent;
2. LV to its exclusive agency in Wuhan for intellectual property
Would like to sell in China, LV, or only change her face
It is reported that LV trademarks louis vuitton shop on the real threat of death from the hands of Wang Jun, the product appearance hold patents. Wang Jun to journalists from the appearance of the product patent is not difficult to identify materials found, Wang Jun for the product appearance and LV logo in the mix of products sold in China is no different, in other words, LV in China to the effect loss of Jingzhou - no combination of its design appearance of the product patent protection. Wang Jun said, LV products amplified if you use a single design element as the appearance of the product is legitimate and legal, if their products appear on the traditional pattern of elements, on the violation of China's Louis Vuitton the appearance of patent
He very familiar chessboard that louis vuitton Monogram Canvas the current categories of LV mainstream appearance to his rights have been infringed, LV product order to continue to sell in the Chinese market, then change her face is the only way out.
